Tuesday, 03 May 2016

Kyrgyzstan's prime minister resigns over corruption scandal

Published in Field Reports
Rate this item
(2 votes)

By Arslan Sabyrbekov

May 6th, the CACI Analyst

On April 11, Kyrgyzstan’s prime minister officially announced his decision to step down amidst allegations of corruption. Temir Sariev, who has headed the Kyrgyz executive for less than a year, became the 26th Kyrgyz prime minister to leave his post since the country’s independence. 


temir-sSpeculations on Sariev’s possible resignation appeared in the media after a statement by Kyrgyzstan’s Minister of Transport and Communication, Argynbek Malabaev, on April 6. The minister publicly accused the prime minister of involvement in a tender to build a strategic 100-kilometer road in the Issyk-Kul province, linking the towns of Balykchy and Korumdu. The estimated cost of the project is ca US$ 100 million and the tender was won by the Chinese company Long Hai, which according to Malabaev “even lacked the license and the needed technical equipment to go ahead with the construction.” Malabaev claimed that he was out of the country in neighboring Kazakhstan during the selection process, and that his deputy helped the prime minister conclude the deal in order to attain personal gains for both of them from this large-scale project. In further support of his allegations, Malabaev also stated that Long Hai’s representative in Kyrgyzstan is a member of the prime minister’s party Ak-Shumkar.

In response to these allegations, Sariev sent a note to President Almazbek Atambayev, requesting Malabaev’s dismissal. The president’s office officially responded that there were no formal grounds to dismiss the minister. A specially created parliamentary commission was set up to investigate the case, chaired by Kanat Isaev, leader of the “Kyrgyzstan” parliamentary faction. Sariev issued a statement declaring that he does not believe in the objectivity of the commission “since its chair Mr. Isaev wanted to participate in the tender himself, but was late with the submission of documents.” However, before the parliamentary commission could complete its investigation, the prime minister announced his decision to step down. Standing in front of the parliament, Sariev stated, “I am resigning from the post of the prime minister, but for the sake of my good name, I am ready to fight till the end. I was never engaged in political intrigues and never will be. Even in the most difficult times, I have fought for my beliefs and principles and therefore, I am demanding an objective investigation of the case, not by a biased parliamentary commission, but by the Anti-Corruption Agency of the State Security Service.”

In his statement, Sariev also expressed his intention to remain active in politics. But according to former MP Ravshan Jeenbekov, “if after his resignation, Sariev will turn into an opposition politician, the authorities might open a criminal case against him regarding the tender. Therefore, he has the option to remain silent just like his predecessors.” Time will tell which path the former prime minister will choose; Sariev has previously stated his intention to pursue the presidency in the 2017 elections.

The unexpected resignation of Sariev, appointed less than a year ago, has generated varying reactions in Kyrgyzstan’s expert and political circles. According to political analyst Emil Juraev, “in a parliamentary system, the resignation of the head of the government is a normal and legitimate procedure. But given the recent border dispute with neighboring Uzbekistan as well as socio-economic challenges, this is not the best time to change the government.” Indeed, all former prime ministers of Kyrgyzstan since independence have served less than a year on average, without demonstrating any significant results and progress, be it in the economy or the social sphere.

Nevertheless, within one day, the ruling coalition chose a new prime minister; the former deputy head of the presidential administration Sooronbai Jeenbekov, who is considered extremely loyal to the president. Jeenbekov took office on April 13, without even presenting his government’s program, simply stating that he will pursue the agenda of his predecessor. There were no significant changes to the government. Malabaev is not included in the new government, but has publicly stated that the President has promised him another position, also in the transport sphere.

Following the appointment of a new prime minister, the speaker of parliament has also voluntarily stepped down, for the simple reason that he is Jeenbekov’s younger brother. The parliament now has to elect a new speaker. 

Image attribution: pbs.twimg.com, accessed on May 3, 2016

Read 6214 times Last modified on Tuesday, 03 May 2016

Visit also





Joint Center Publications

Article S. Frederick Starr, "Why Central Asia Counts", Middle East Insights, November 6, 2017

Article Mamuka Tsereteli, “Russian Aggression in the Black Sea Cannot Go Unanswered” The Hill, September 11, 2017

Article Bilahari Kausikan, Fred Starr, and Yang Cheng, “Asia’s Game of Thrones, Central Asia: All Together Now.” The American Interest, June 16,2017

Article Svante E. Cornell “The Raucous Caucasus” The American Interest, May 2, 2017

Resource Page "Resources on Terrorism and Radical Islamism in Central Asia", Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, April 11, 2017.

Silk Road Monograph Nicklas Norling, Party Problems and Factionalism in Soviet Uzbekistan: Evidence from the Communist Party Archives, March 2017.

Oped Svante E. Cornell, "Russia: An Enabler of Jihad?", W. Martens Center for European Studies, January 16, 2017.

Book Svante E. Cornell, ed., The International Politics of the Armenian-Azerbaijani Conflict: The Original 'Frozen Conflict' and European Security, Palgrave, 2017. 

Article Svante E. Cornell, The fallacy of ‘compartmentalisation’: the West and Russia from Ukraine to Syria, European View, Volume 15, Issue 1, June 2016.

Silk Road Paper Shirin Akiner, Kyrgyzstan 2010: Conflict and Context, July 2016. 

Silk Road Paper John C. K. Daly, Rush to Judgment: Western Media and the 2005 Andijan ViolenceMay 2016.

Silk Road Paper Jeffry Hartman, The May 2005 Andijan Uprising: What We KnowMay 2016.

Silk Road Paper Johanna Popjanevski, Retribution and the Rule of Law: The Politics of Justice in Georgia, June 2015.

Book S. Frederick Starr and Svante E. Cornell, eds., ·Putin's Grand Strategy: The Eurasian Union and its Discontents, Joint Center Monograph, September 2014.

The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst is a biweekly publication of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, a Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council, Washington DC., and the Institute for Security and Development Policy, Stockholm. For 15 years, the Analyst has brought cutting edge analysis of the region geared toward a practitioner audience.


Sign up for upcoming events, latest news and articles from the CACI Analyst