Wednesday, 24 April 2013

U.S. To Cut Aid To Central Asia

Published in Field Reports
Rate this item
(1 Vote)

by Aigul Kasymova (04/03/2013 issue of the CACI Analyst)

According to the Congressional Budget Justification by the Department of State (FY2013), the U.S. will make a cut of 13 percent in aid to the Central Asian region. Assistance from the U.S. will stress the importance of security programs in the region rather than programs aimed at the economy, politics, health and/or education. Despite the drop in aid, U.S. policies toward Kyrgyzstan will continue to support programs aimed at assisting the country’s development.

 

Kyrgyzstan has since its independence in 1991, similar to its neighboring countries in Central Asia, become a new market for foreign aid. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has been providing assistance to Kyrgyzstan since 1992 and is the largest single-country donor organization in the country. According to USAID, it has provided around US$ 460 million in programs aimed at supporting the country’s development in various sectors such as health care, the economy and democratic institutions. In Kyrgyzstan, USAID works in various fields such as education, economic growth and trade, agriculture and food security, global health, democracy, human rights and governance, and crisis and conflict management.

Over 21 years of assistance from USAID, Kyrgyzstan has overcome various obstacles as a nation-state. It went from being an authoritarian regime to having a parliamentary system. With two revolutions in 2005 and 2010 which were accompanied by violence, Kyrgyzstan is today working towards establishing government accountability and transparency. The flow of foreign aid greatly assists the government in creating a favorable environment in this regard.

According to the U.S. Annual Submission to the OECD/DAC via USAID’s Foreign Assistance Database, Kyrgyzstan received US$ 54.1 million from USAID alone in 2011, and an additional US$ 4.3 million from the U.S. Department of State. The same year, Central Asia as a region received a total of US$ 28.9 million from both U.S. agencies. Out of all Central Asian countries, Kyrgyzstan was the largest recipient of USAID assistance in the region in 2011, whereas Uzbekistan received the smallest amount. The State Department’s aid to the region of Central Asia in 2013 would amount in total to US$ 118.3 million. Compared to 2012, the overall aid to the region has been cut by US$ 15.3 million. However, despite the drop in aid, U.S. security assistance to the region will remain largely unchanged.

According to the Department of State’s foreign assistance program, the main U.S. objective in Kyrgyzstan in 2013 will be “the consolidation of democratic gains in the country and the development of a more representative government that provides improved access to justice and better citizen services.” In other words, the U.S. will in 2013 allocate funding for programs that will focus on supporting democratic processes and building democratic institutions, respect for human rights and rule of law, and decreasing the level of inter-ethnic conflict. Like in previous years, the U.S. will continue to support the development of a parliamentary system and engagement of civil society.

Under the Peace and Security category, the U.S. will work with the government of Kyrgyzstan to fight corruption and raise overall capacity and professionalism. Programs under this category will focus on combating human trafficking, improving border control and security, increase the level of military professionals, reforming the state’s security structure, and fight international terrorism including early detection of terrorist threats. It is clear that such programs aim to secure the borders of Central Asian states ahead of NATO’s 2014 withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Under the Governing Justly and Democratically category, aid programs aim to assist the government in developing a more transparent and representative government. In order to achieve the aim, programs will focus on the parliament, applicable ministries, civil society representatives and media. Previous assistance from the U.S. to Kyrgyzstan has targeted programs aimed at supporting parliament and civil society.

Despite the cut in aid, Kyrgyzstan remains the biggest recipient of U.S. foreign assistance among the Central Asian countries. With the new foreign assistance program for 2013, it becomes evident that with troops pulling out in Afghanistan in 2014, the U.S. is preparing so called “transit countries,” Kyrgyzstan being one of them, for future threats involving international terrorism. Thus, despite the recommended cut in aid to the region, programs directed toward security will continue to receive approximately the same amount of aid. Programs under the Peace and Security category will hence be the main focus of U.S. foreign aid policy in Kyrgyzstan.

Read 4707 times Last modified on Wednesday, 24 April 2013

Visit also

silkroad

AFPC

isdp

turkeyanalyst

Joint Center Publications

Article S. Frederick Starr, "Why Central Asia Counts", Middle East Insights, November 6, 2017

Article Mamuka Tsereteli, “Russian Aggression in the Black Sea Cannot Go Unanswered” The Hill, September 11, 2017

Article Bilahari Kausikan, Fred Starr, and Yang Cheng, “Asia’s Game of Thrones, Central Asia: All Together Now.” The American Interest, June 16,2017

Article Svante E. Cornell “The Raucous Caucasus” The American Interest, May 2, 2017

Resource Page "Resources on Terrorism and Radical Islamism in Central Asia", Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, April 11, 2017.

Silk Road Monograph Nicklas Norling, Party Problems and Factionalism in Soviet Uzbekistan: Evidence from the Communist Party Archives, March 2017.

Oped Svante E. Cornell, "Russia: An Enabler of Jihad?", W. Martens Center for European Studies, January 16, 2017.

Book Svante E. Cornell, ed., The International Politics of the Armenian-Azerbaijani Conflict: The Original 'Frozen Conflict' and European Security, Palgrave, 2017. 

Article Svante E. Cornell, The fallacy of ‘compartmentalisation’: the West and Russia from Ukraine to Syria, European View, Volume 15, Issue 1, June 2016.

Silk Road Paper Shirin Akiner, Kyrgyzstan 2010: Conflict and Context, July 2016. 

Silk Road Paper John C. K. Daly, Rush to Judgment: Western Media and the 2005 Andijan ViolenceMay 2016.

Silk Road Paper Jeffry Hartman, The May 2005 Andijan Uprising: What We KnowMay 2016.

Silk Road Paper Johanna Popjanevski, Retribution and the Rule of Law: The Politics of Justice in Georgia, June 2015.

Book S. Frederick Starr and Svante E. Cornell, eds., ·Putin's Grand Strategy: The Eurasian Union and its Discontents, Joint Center Monograph, September 2014.

The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst is a biweekly publication of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, a Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council, Washington DC., and the Institute for Security and Development Policy, Stockholm. For 15 years, the Analyst has brought cutting edge analysis of the region geared toward a practitioner audience.

Newsletter

Sign up for upcoming events, latest news and articles from the CACI Analyst

Newsletter