Tuesday, 01 September 2015

New prospects in Armenia-Georgia relations

Published in Field Reports
Rate this item
(4 votes)

By Erik Davtyan (19/08/2015 issue of the CACI Analyst)

July was a productive month for bilateral cooperation between Armenia and Georgia. Firstly, the two states expanded their dialogue in the military sphere. On July 16, a delegation headed by Armenia’s first Deputy Minister of Defense Davit Tonoyan visited Tbilisi. A subsequent meeting between representatives of the two defense ministries took place on June 24-25 within the framework of the North Atlantic Council (NAC) Defense Ministers meeting in Brussels, during which Armenia’s and Georgia’s Defense Ministers Seyran Ohanyan and Tinatin Khidasheli discussed bilateral military ties. Khidasheli later explained that the parties agreed “to find new areas of cooperation.”

On July 16, the main focus of Armenian-Georgian talks was military education. As Khidasheli stated, “this visit aims to deepen cooperation between our military educational institutions in order to share experience and knowledge.” In this context, Armenia’s military participated in the four-week-long Intermediate Summer Mountain Training Course held under NATO’s Partnership for Peace (PfP), which officially ended on August 14. According to the Georgian Defense Ministry, Georgian instructors of the Sachkhere Mountain School conducted training for 12 military personnel from Armenia, Latvia, Ukraine and Jordan. Simultaneously, officers of the Georgian Armed Forces, as well as public servants undergo training at the American University of Armenia.

In an interview to the Mediamax news agency, Tonoyan mentioned that “a stable Armenia and a stable Georgia are equally important for our countries. The numerous meetings we had over the past years focused on the detailed discussion of all security-related issues, and we have arrived at absolute mutual trust, transparency and consideration and respect for one another’s views.” Moreover, Tonoyan underlined that despite their gradual integration in different security structures, “Armenia and Georgia are almost unanimous about regional security matters.”

Along with military affairs, Armenia and Georgia expanded their economic cooperation. On July 27, Armenia’s Prime Minister Hovik Abrahamyan paid a working visit to Georgia and together with his colleague Irakli Gharibashvili visited the Daryali-Verkhny Lars border checkpoint on the Georgian-Russian border. The two heads of government inspected the ongoing activities and the problems faced by Armenian Russia-bound transit trucks. The main result of the Armenian PM’s visit was a new arrangement, according to which the Daryali-Verkhny Lars checkpoint will be opened for an additional 3.5 hours per day. Under the new arrangement, the checkpoint will be open from 05.30 a.m. to midnight. The Daryali-Verkhny Lars checkpoint is of key importance for Armenian trade relations, as it is the only functioning land route connecting Armenia and Georgia to the Russian Federation.

Another impetus for developing Armenian-Georgian relations is the ongoing construction of a new checkpoint in Bagratashen. Prior to the meeting with his Georgian counterpart, Abrahamyan visited the Armenian-Georgian state border and inspected the current status of checkpoint improvements. “What matters most is that modern border crossing conditions will be offered to citizens and economic entities,” the Armenian PM said. The modernization of three checkpoints (in Bagratashen, Gogavan and Bavra) is estimated to cost US$ 70 million. The project is co-financed by the government of Armenia, the Office of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), as well as other international organizations.

Abrahamyan and Gharibashvili also discussed the project of the “Friendship” bridge, which is planned to be constructed on the interstate border in Bagratashen. Reportedly, 60 percent of the project will be financed by the Georgian government and the 40 percent by Armenian authorities. The total cost is estimated to € 10 million.

Armenian experts highlight the fact that Armenian-Georgian relations are currently becoming more productive than previously. Political scientist Hrant Melik-Shahnazaryan argues that Armenian-Georgian relations are developing not only from a bilateral point of view, but also in the context of infrastructure that facilitates transportation to Russia via Georgia and vice versa. The expert also believes that the frequency in mutual visits shows that “the two countries are prepare quite positive dynamics in their relations and will seek to bolster economic cooperation.” In an interview to Sputnik Armenia, the expert on Georgian studies Johnny Melikian argued that pragmatism dominates in bilateral relations. He described the Armenia-Georgia relationship as “a game with two distinct roles”: uninterrupted transit for Armenia and security for Georgia.

Generally, experts stress that matters of common concern for Armenia and Georgia are frequently solved at the highest level, due to the cordial relations between the incumbent Prime Ministers of the two states.

Image attribution: Boris Ajeganov

Read 5112 times Last modified on Tuesday, 25 August 2015

Visit also

silkroad

AFPC

isdp

turkeyanalyst

Joint Center Publications

Article S. Frederick Starr, "Why Central Asia Counts", Middle East Insights, November 6, 2017

Article Mamuka Tsereteli, “Russian Aggression in the Black Sea Cannot Go Unanswered” The Hill, September 11, 2017

Article Bilahari Kausikan, Fred Starr, and Yang Cheng, “Asia’s Game of Thrones, Central Asia: All Together Now.” The American Interest, June 16,2017

Article Svante E. Cornell “The Raucous Caucasus” The American Interest, May 2, 2017

Resource Page "Resources on Terrorism and Radical Islamism in Central Asia", Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, April 11, 2017.

Silk Road Monograph Nicklas Norling, Party Problems and Factionalism in Soviet Uzbekistan: Evidence from the Communist Party Archives, March 2017.

Oped Svante E. Cornell, "Russia: An Enabler of Jihad?", W. Martens Center for European Studies, January 16, 2017.

Book Svante E. Cornell, ed., The International Politics of the Armenian-Azerbaijani Conflict: The Original 'Frozen Conflict' and European Security, Palgrave, 2017. 

Article Svante E. Cornell, The fallacy of ‘compartmentalisation’: the West and Russia from Ukraine to Syria, European View, Volume 15, Issue 1, June 2016.

Silk Road Paper Shirin Akiner, Kyrgyzstan 2010: Conflict and Context, July 2016. 

Silk Road Paper John C. K. Daly, Rush to Judgment: Western Media and the 2005 Andijan ViolenceMay 2016.

Silk Road Paper Jeffry Hartman, The May 2005 Andijan Uprising: What We KnowMay 2016.

Silk Road Paper Johanna Popjanevski, Retribution and the Rule of Law: The Politics of Justice in Georgia, June 2015.

Book S. Frederick Starr and Svante E. Cornell, eds., ·Putin's Grand Strategy: The Eurasian Union and its Discontents, Joint Center Monograph, September 2014.

The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst is a biweekly publication of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, a Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council, Washington DC., and the Institute for Security and Development Policy, Stockholm. For 15 years, the Analyst has brought cutting edge analysis of the region geared toward a practitioner audience.

Newsletter

Sign up for upcoming events, latest news and articles from the CACI Analyst

Newsletter