Wednesday, 30 October 2013

Educational Migration from Kazakhstan to China: A Shift Eastward?

Published in Field Reports
Rate this item
(3 votes)

By Yelena Sadovskaya (the 30/10/2013 issue of the CACI Analyst)

Over the last ten years, an increasing number of students from Central Asian countries are going to China to study. Kazakhstan ranks first in this list. In the 2003/2004 academic year, only 20 Kazakhstani students obtained education in China under the state student exchange program with Republic of Kazakhstan, while after signing a bilateral agreement on cooperation in 2006, the number of students and trainees – under all kinds of programs (state, corporative and commercial where students pay for themselves), increased several times. According to China’s Ministry of Education, in 2010 as many as 7,874 Kazakhstani students were getting education in China and 1,500 Chinese students in Kazakhstan. 

For many young people in Kazakhstan, the major reason for such a “shift eastward” is the poor quality of national higher and secondary professional education. In many cases there is no or little correlation of the education with the labor market demands, leading to potential unemployment. Other reasons are high cost of education and living in cities as well as all-pervasive corruption.

Conversely, young people are attracted by the relatively low cost of university education in China, the growing international image of Chinese higher schools, chances to learn the Chinese language, the prospect of a prestigious occupation, and the higher salaries in Chinese and joint ventures. Surely, the geopolitical and geo-economic rise of China itself makes education in this geographically close country more attractive. Particularly, the higher education institutions of the neighboring Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region are admitting more and more students from Kazakhstan and other countries of Central Asia. In recent years, China has become actively involved in global competition for students and promotes its universities in the world market both in South-South, and South-North directions. Its active promotion of educational programs and investment into the educational sector in Kazakhstan is considered part of China’s “soft power” policies in the Central Asian region.

Modern educational migration to China raises numerous questions regarding students’ motivation and plans for their future: to stay in China, to come back home, or to move to another country to work, and many others. The views of Kazakhstani people on the realities and prospects of obtaining education in China were studied in a 2012 representative social survey, conducted among urban citizens by the Almaty-based BRiF Central Asia Social and Marketing Research Agency, which confirms the impressive dynamics of educational migration to China.

According to the interviews, 16 percent of the respondents have had acquaintances, friends or relatives getting education in China at present or in the past. The survey also revealed a growing interest among Kazakhstanis both in obtaining education in China and specializing in Sinology in Kazakhstan. According to the interviews, 12 percent of the respondents are themselves willing to study in China, while 18 percent want such education for their children. 13 percent of the respondents would like to obtain a Sinology specialization in Kazakhstan, and 16 percent want their children to do so. 

The regional profile shows that the desire to study in China is the highest in Almaty, Kazakhstan’s former capital. Here, 27 percent of the respondents have acquaintances, friends or relatives, who study or have studied in China. 17 percent of the Almaty respondents want to study in China while 32 percent want Chinese education for their children. 27 percent of Almaty residents state that they want to specialize in Sinology in Kazakhstan and 39 percent that their children should do so.

Predictably, the share of those willing to be educated in China or specialized in Sinology is the highest among respondents aged 15-29 and among young people with complete or incomplete secondary or higher education. The national group profile shows a growing interest in Chinese education and/or specialization among Kazakh respondents, whose positive responses to these questions are 1.5-2 times higher than among respondents of Russian or other nationality.

Such educational preferences of Kazakhstani residents coincide with China’s plans to extend admission of foreign students. On June 7, 2012 during the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Summit in Beijing, China declared its decision to deliver education to 1,500 specialists from SCO member-countries in Chinese universities over three years. Moreover, during the next 10 years, China will provide 30,000 state grants and will receive 10,000 students and tutors from its various international Confucius Institutes for education and advanced training. This goal was confirmed during the first official visit of PRC Chairman Xi Jinping to Kazakhstan in September 2013.

Taking into account the dynamics of student migration eastward through all channels ranging from governmental to private, the growing Kazakhstani interest in obtaining education in China as well as the PRC’s plans to extend admission of foreign students, educational migration and academic mobility from Kazakhstan to China are likely to increase. The potential outcome may be a “brain gain” since Kazakhstan’s labor market is replenished with a skilled labor force trained in China.

However there is also a risk of “brain drain” from Kazakhstan to the East, rather than to the West. Today, brain drain is manifested not only in an irrevocable intellectual emigration, but also in the transformation of temporary educational migration into permanent residence migration to the receiving country, the PRC. Dynamically developing China can provide new openings for professional and social mobility for university graduates in the country. Moreover, young people get married, creating channels of “matrimonial migration.” In sum, the eastward emigration of Kazakhstani students is inherent with great potential as well as risks.

Read 7584 times Last modified on Wednesday, 30 October 2013

Visit also

silkroad

AFPC

isdp

turkeyanalyst

Joint Center Publications

Article S. Frederick Starr, "Why Central Asia Counts", Middle East Insights, November 6, 2017

Article Mamuka Tsereteli, “Russian Aggression in the Black Sea Cannot Go Unanswered” The Hill, September 11, 2017

Article Bilahari Kausikan, Fred Starr, and Yang Cheng, “Asia’s Game of Thrones, Central Asia: All Together Now.” The American Interest, June 16,2017

Article Svante E. Cornell “The Raucous Caucasus” The American Interest, May 2, 2017

Resource Page "Resources on Terrorism and Radical Islamism in Central Asia", Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, April 11, 2017.

Silk Road Monograph Nicklas Norling, Party Problems and Factionalism in Soviet Uzbekistan: Evidence from the Communist Party Archives, March 2017.

Oped Svante E. Cornell, "Russia: An Enabler of Jihad?", W. Martens Center for European Studies, January 16, 2017.

Book Svante E. Cornell, ed., The International Politics of the Armenian-Azerbaijani Conflict: The Original 'Frozen Conflict' and European Security, Palgrave, 2017. 

Article Svante E. Cornell, The fallacy of ‘compartmentalisation’: the West and Russia from Ukraine to Syria, European View, Volume 15, Issue 1, June 2016.

Silk Road Paper Shirin Akiner, Kyrgyzstan 2010: Conflict and Context, July 2016. 

Silk Road Paper John C. K. Daly, Rush to Judgment: Western Media and the 2005 Andijan ViolenceMay 2016.

Silk Road Paper Jeffry Hartman, The May 2005 Andijan Uprising: What We KnowMay 2016.

Silk Road Paper Johanna Popjanevski, Retribution and the Rule of Law: The Politics of Justice in Georgia, June 2015.

Book S. Frederick Starr and Svante E. Cornell, eds., ·Putin's Grand Strategy: The Eurasian Union and its Discontents, Joint Center Monograph, September 2014.

The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst is a biweekly publication of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, a Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council, Washington DC., and the Institute for Security and Development Policy, Stockholm. For 15 years, the Analyst has brought cutting edge analysis of the region geared toward a practitioner audience.

Newsletter

Sign up for upcoming events, latest news and articles from the CACI Analyst

Newsletter