Wednesday, 05 April 2006

KAZAKHSTAN’S MILITARY ARMAMENT PRIORITIES

Published in Analytical Articles

By Roger N McDermott & Col. Igor Mukhamedov (4/5/2006 issue of the CACI Analyst)

BACKGROUND: Astana’s new sense of confidence in its own defense industries was much in evidence on February 10 when Galym Orazbakov, President of Kazakhstan Engineering National Company, explained in Astana, “We expect the export of the company’s special products to double in 2006,” comparing with its record in 2005. This will be most notable in Kazakhstan’s future exports to the Indo-Pacific region. “Recently, we held talks with our partners in India and Egypt who are planning to hold tenders for the purchase of arms.
BACKGROUND: Astana’s new sense of confidence in its own defense industries was much in evidence on February 10 when Galym Orazbakov, President of Kazakhstan Engineering National Company, explained in Astana, “We expect the export of the company’s special products to double in 2006,” comparing with its record in 2005. This will be most notable in Kazakhstan’s future exports to the Indo-Pacific region. “Recently, we held talks with our partners in India and Egypt who are planning to hold tenders for the purchase of arms. The company is planning to take part in these,” Orazbakov explained. Specialist products exported would include depth charges and torpedoes. Orazbakov’s confidence in the Kazakhstan Engineering National Company, formed in spring 2003 and consolidating 21 mostly machine-building companies, is based on the level of demand from the Indo-Pacific region and the contracts currently secured with these countries. Kazakhstan’s intense diplomacy with key trading partners also develops more opportunities to secure lucrative defense contracts. The export of specialist products including torpedoes and depth charges increased slightly in 2004, by 4 per cent. Orazbakov said that “historically, we have been carrying out a number of joint projects with India aimed at modernizing and repairing the torpedoes belonging to the Indian Navy. We are also designing a new torpedo called Kazy.” During the latest talks held between February 13-15, 2006, the Indian delegation proposed widening the current scale of cooperation in the area of defense industries. It was also suggested that joint projects in producing and upgrading some types of conventional weapons, such as combat vehicles and tanks, should be considered. In Kazakhstan, domestic sales of military armaments have risen by 5.6 per cent compared with 2004, based on the increased demands of the Nazarbayev military reform program. Yet this domestic rise is partly related to the Zenit joint stock company producing Sunkar-M military cutters, and the aircraft repair plant No. 405, which repairs military helicopters. Ships are urgently needed for the Navy, as well as transport aircraft and modernized air defense systems. Kazakhstan intends to open a center for Landover maintenance on the basis of the armored mobile vehicles HMMWV. Such initiatives are also underpinned by security assistance from other countries to Kazakhstan. China provides vehicles and equipment, and South Korea has provided three ships. Kazakhstan is also signaling its readiness to consider buying western types of equipment and weapons. A marketing sub-department within the armament department of the MoD, tasked with dealing with this side of procurement, is currently under consideration. The budget allows this in theory, but the Kazakhstani government will require strong arguments in favor of any new type of western weaponry, if such plans are to succeed.

IMPLICATIONS: The demands of Kazakhstan’s existing military reform priorities, which highlight in particular the airmobile forces, peace support and antiterrorist capabilities, place additional demands within the system to increase troop mobility and react at speed to any potential crisis situation. Traditionally, the armed forces have been heavily reliant on its declining stock of Soviet and Russian hardware and weapons systems. Achieving NATO interoperability within its key formations will entail looking beyond Russia to procure the equipment its armed forces will need. That is why within the framework of the five-year plan of military cooperation with the U.S., Kazakhstan has been successfully working on equipping the airmobile forces with HMMWVs. Kazakhstan has already received more than 30 vehicles. During the visit of U.S. military representatives to Almaty in early February 2006, the issue of obtaining 17 or 18 additional vehicles was discussed. Unlike most other states that use HMMWVs, Kazakhstan has created its own “HMMWV-Asia Center” to maintain those vehicles, which has been operational since September 2005. At the end of 2006, Kazakhstan is expected to receive the first Huey helicopters for its airmobile forces and it is also discussing with the U.S. the possibility of receiving C-130 transport aircraft. Such airframes and the accompanying supporting packages will result in the Kazakhstani MoD planning repair and maintenance arrangements; reflecting the arrangements with the HMMWVs. With the next rotation in Iraq of the Kazakhstani peacekeeping component of KAZBAT, Astana is planning to deploy a small number of armored HMMWVs. The idea is in its early stages, but it reveals the commitment of the Kazakhstani government to the promotion of its peace support capabilities, from which it has gained a great deal of positive publicity owing to the presence of KAZBAT in Iraq. Also on February 10, Kazakhstan’s Foreign Minister Kasymzhomart Tokayev held a series of meetings with U.S. ambassador John Ordway, Russian ambassador Vladimir Babichev and Indian ambassador Ashok Mukherjee in Astana. Predictably, the Kazakhstani Foreign ministry said Tokayev “discussed expanding bilateral contacts in various areas of cooperation, and looked at a wide range of international and regional issues of mutual interest.” Yet, Mukherjee presented Tokayev with an invitation to visit India on an official visit later this year, showing New Delhi’s interest in forging stronger ties with Kazakhstan and increasing Indian interests in Central Asia. An Indian dimension is therefore central to the hopes of increased sales output from Kazakhstan’s defense industries. In fact a Kazakhstani delegation recently participated in an international exhibition of land and naval weapons, Defexpo India 2006, in New Delhi. Consequently the Indian government expressed interest in holding talks on procuring torpedoes and mines for the Indian Navy. “The major result for Kazakhstan, which took part in such an exhibition for the first time, is that the Indian Ministry of Defense has expressed an interest in cooperation with our defense companies. In the future, talks can be conducted on selling Kazakh torpedoes and naval mines to India,” a spokesman for the Ministry of Defense confirmed.

CONCLUSIONS: Domestically, the defense industries, although lacking in transparency, often provide a glimpse of how and where the Kazakhstani government is procuring weapons for its armed forces. Nazarbayev’s commitment to developing a Naval security component to the armed forces, as his country’s contribution towards Caspian security, and his drive to reform the armed forces may be measured in how domestic defense industries supply the needs of the military. Military reform and the foreign security initiatives that facilitate the development of the program in a constructive manner, compel complimentary domestic supporting plans, such as the creation of Kazakhstani centers capable of carrying out repair and maintenance on key military assets. In this area, the leadership of the Kazakhstani MoD will be crucial, raising the importance of having suitably qualified personnel carrying out detailed and systemic work in the armaments department, avoiding the pitfalls overbearing political interference.

AUTHORS’ BIO: Roger N. McDermott is an Honorary Senior Research Fellow, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Kent at Canterbury (UK) and a Senior Fellow in Eurasian Military Studies, Jamestown Foundation, Washington, D.C. Col. Igor M. Mukhamedov is a senior officer serving in the Kazakhstani MoD, with a Master’s Degree in National Security from the Naval Post-Graduate School, Monterey, California. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of any official body.

Read 3650 times

Visit also

silkroad

AFPC

isdp

turkeyanalyst

Staff Publications

Screen Shot 2023-05-08 at 10.32.15 AMSilk Road Paper S. Frederick Starr, U.S. Policy in Central Asia through Central Asian Eyes, May 2023.


Analysis Svante E. Cornell, "Promise and Peril in the Caucasus," AFPC Insights, March 30, 2023.

Oped S. Frederick Starr, Putin's War In Ukraine and the Crimean War), 19fourtyfive, January 2, 2023

Oped S. Frederick Starr, Russia Needs Its Own Charles de Gaulle,  Foreign Policy, July 21, 2022.

2206-StarrSilk Road Paper S. Frederick Starr, Rethinking Greater Central Asia: American and Western Stakes in the Region and How to Advance Them, June 2022 

Oped Svante E. Cornell & Albert Barro, With referendum, Kazakh President pushes for reforms, Euractiv, June 3, 2022.

Oped Svante E. Cornell Russia's Southern Neighbors Take a Stand, The Hill, May 6, 2022.

Silk Road Paper Johan Engvall, Between Bandits and Bureaucrats: 30 Years of Parliamentary Development in Kyrgyzstan, January 2022.  

Oped Svante E. Cornell, No, The War in Ukraine is not about NATO, The Hill, March 9, 2022.

Analysis Svante E. Cornell, Kazakhstan’s Crisis Calls for a Central Asia Policy Reboot, The National Interest, January 34, 2022.

StronguniquecoverBook S. Frederick Starr and Svante E. Cornell, Strong and Unique: Three Decades of U.S.-Kazakhstan Partnership, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, December 2021.  

Silk Road Paper Svante E. Cornell, S. Frederick Starr & Albert Barro, Political and Economic Reforms in Kazakhstan Under President Tokayev, November 2021.

The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst is a biweekly publication of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, a Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council, Washington DC., and the Institute for Security and Development Policy, Stockholm. For 15 years, the Analyst has brought cutting edge analysis of the region geared toward a practitioner audience.

Newsletter

Sign up for upcoming events, latest news and articles from the CACI Analyst

Newsletter