logo
Published on Central Asia-Caucasus Institute Analyst (http://cacianalyst.org)

THE ADYGEYA REPUBLIC: A LITMUS TEST OF RUSSIAN FEDERALISM?

By Hasan Kanbolat & Suat Kiniklioglu (05/08/2002 issue of the CACI Analyst)

BACKGROUND: One of
the major features of the Putin administration is the increasing tendency to stem
centrifugal forces within the Russian Federation and strengthen the Center. In response,
the federal republics as well as all other administrative units (krai, oblast, federal
city, autonomous oblast and autonomous okrug) are using every opportunity to maintain and
possibly increase the political, economic, social and cultural autonomy attained during
the Soviet and immediate post-Soviet era. The current struggle between these two opposing
trends is destined to determine what sort of federalism will prevail in the Russian
Federation. The struggle between the centrifugal and centripetal forces in some areas
where the titular nation forms a majority - as in Chechnya - the aforementioned tension
translated into open political violence, indeed into warfare; or into strong political
tensions, as in Tatarstan. In contrast, in areas where the titular nation is a minority,
the struggle for or against more centralization primarily evolves around democratic
elections between the non-titular Slavic majority and the titular minority. The Adygey
Republic (AR), one of the 21 federal republics of the Russian Federation, is a small but
interesting example of the ongoing power struggle between Moscow and the regions. 27
percent of the 450,000 inhabitants of the AR are Adygey - an ethnic Circassian people,
which emerged as a distinct people in the 13th century. Slavs, including Cossacks, make up
67 per cent. Following a short-lived experience of independence early in the past century,
Adygeya became an autonomous region within the Krasnodar krai. When the USSR disintegrated
the AR declared its sovereignty in June 1991, which was recognized by the Upper Parliament
of the Russian Federation in July 1991. The AR was also recognized as a republic at the
signing of the Federation Treaty in March 1992. Hence Adygeya\'s status was elevated from
that of an autonomous oblast to a sovereign republic. The AR consolidated its federate
republic status and adopted its own constitution in 1995, according to which the Russian
and Adygey languages were recognized as official languages of the AR.

IMPLICATIONS: In
terms of centralization policies, the Putin era was marked by a number of measures,
including the increased scrutiny of the laws and constitutions of the republics and their
accordance with the constitution of the Russian Federation. The Putin administration
re-organized the Russian Federation on the basis of political, economic and military
criteria in July 2000 and divided Russia into seven regions, ruled by centrally appointed
governors. Subsequently, the former North Caucasian Federal Region became Southern Russia.
Furthermore, the newly-created region\'s borders were extended further towards the north,
so that the demographic structure of the region became dominated by ethnic Russians.

During
Soviet times, titular nationalities could come to power thanks to the \'paritet\' (equal
representation) even though they may constitute a numerical minority in a given republic.
The paritet system is by and large still implemented in the federal republics of the
Russian Federation. Nevertheless, paritet is increasingly being criticized by nationalist
elements of the Slavic population (Russians, Cossacks, Ukrainians and Belarussians). The
Adygeya Slavic Union does not accept the titular Adygey government\'s legitimacy.
Furthermore, some Moscow-based media outlets are actively supporting the Slavic Union.
These media outlets dangerously describe Adygeya as a \'second Chechnya in the making\'. The
Slavic Union\'s seemingly justified opposition to paritet is in fact anti-democratic on
moral and ethical grounds as the Slavic elements were settled there by the imperial
Russian government centuries after the indigenous Adygey. The Adygey intelligentsia, which
is opposed to the Slavic nationalists, finds it unacceptable that the federal structure of
the Adygeya Republic and the Russian Federation is deliberately tainted with.

On 13 January 2002 the Adygeya Republic conducted presidential elections. Following
intense pressure applied by the pro-Russian Slavic Union before the election a suspension
of the language law that requires the president to be bilingual in Adyge and Russian was
passed. Furthermore, the candidate of the Slavic Union, Nina Kanalavolava openly declared
that she would see to it that if she were elected, Adygeya\'s republic status would be
lifted and it would become part of the Krasnodar krai. The Slavic Union also called for
the revival of the traditional Cossack paramilitary forces, a symbol of Russian
colonialism and oppression of the last century. Such developments raised concerns whether
Adygeya could indeed become another hotspot of ethnic conflict in the North Caucasus.
Eventually, contrary to such fears, Hazret Sovmen, an Adygey businessman and
philanthropist obtained 68 per cent of the votes and was sworn in as president on February
8. The election of Sovmen, who owns one of the world\'s largest gold mining firms, also
confirmed a recent trend in Russian politics, namely the election of rich businessmen to
the presidency in the Federation\'s republics.

CONCLUSIONS: The
Adygey, who lost over 90 percent of their people during the war with Tsarist Russia in the
second half of the 19th century through ethnic cleansing and compulsory migration, are
conscious of the fact that another confrontation with Russia may wipe out their republic,
as happened to the Ubykh people - another Caucasian but now extinct people that lived to
the west of Adygeya. Therefore, Adygeya\'s government seeks to strengthen its sovereignty
by supporting the federal structure of the Russian Federation. Proud of hosting a mild
climate, productive soil, an industry capable of attracting foreign investment and a
favorite area for pensioners, the Adygey Republic is a rare safe haven of stability in the
northern Caucasus. However, the levels that Adygey-Slavic tensions may reach, and the
difficulty to foresee developments after the presidential elections will be critical
elements in the future stability of this northwestern Caucasian republic. Undoubtedly, the
level of support lent by Moscow to the pro-Slavic organizations which oppose the
development of statehood of the Adygey Republic on the basis of an Adygey identity will be
the most crucial factors for the viability of stability in this region.

AUTHORS\' BIO: Hasan
Kanbolat is a senior researcher at the Center for Eurasian Strategic Studies (ASAM), and a
former project manager of the Turkish International Cooperation Agency (TIKA) and the
Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. His research interests lie with Caucasian affairs,
Russia\'s Caucasus policy and Turkey\'s role in the Caucasus. Suat Kiniklioglu is
Coordinator of the Center for Russian Studies at Bilkent University, Ankara. His research
interests lie with Turkish-Russian relations, mutual perceptions, Turkish-Ukrainian
relations, and Black Sea/Caucasus security issues.

Copyright 2001 The Analyst.

All rights reserved


Source URL:
http://cacianalyst.org/?q=node/937